/sarcasm off

“I guess that’s why neither will debate John Mackay. They don’t want to prove their loser’s like we know they are! lol. I wish I had as much FAITH as you Clowns!”

You mean this John Mackay? It could be a different one. Let us know. Was the debate going to be about demonic possession? In that case, Dawkins and most other scientists don’t know anything about it, and would reasonably be called on to “prove their losers”.

http://creation.com/regarding-john-mackay

quote
“…in response to the aftermath of a horrific attack (February, 1986) on our ministry (then called Creation Science Foundation, later Answers in Genesis Australia) by Mr Mackay.

The mechanism of attack involved a monstrous series of allegations without evidence—the basis was alleged ‘spiritual discernment’, involving ‘black cats’ and similar. These slanderous allegations concerned Margaret Buchanan, at the time a well-regarded Christian widow working for the ministry as Ken Ham’s personal secretary. John said she had been ‘specially sent by Satan’ to undermine him and the ministry, involved in covens, attending séances, etc.—never was there any eyewitness testimony or other evidence, merely ‘discernment’.

When his attempt to sack her and take over the ministry failed, due to the Board’s refusal to violate biblical principle, Mr Mackay resigned. This was followed by a campaign of widespread innuendo and slander, involving actual fabrications which if accepted would tend to bolster his claim of ‘demonic infiltration’ of our ministry and thus would tend to undermine public confidence in our ministry. This included the bizarre and incredibly offensive claim that Margaret had claimed to have had intercourse with the corpse of her late husband (!).
”

end quote

http://drjimsthinkingshop.com/2009/08/14/evolutionism-the-lie-agreed-upon-a-dissatisfied-customer/

- John

In any case, the best advice is, you can never go wrong by trying some reading, actual study and thought.