Know Yer Nuts #5! C.A.R.E. Ministries, more Instant Magic Earth Poofists!

Fifth in my series on annoying Canadian creationists and religiously rightwing party-poopers is

C. A. R. E. (Christian Apologetics Research & Evangelism) Ministries

Based in Winnipeg, this the first out of province purveyor of anti-intellectualism to be so honoured!

First of all a hat tip to my Facebook friend, Graham Microraptor, and his great post there on geology vs. creationist-rocks-in-the-brain and his good buddy  Erik who picked up on a few choice words G. M. used and coined a new label for Young Earth Creationists.

Instant Magic Earth Poofists™!

Am I... evolving?
moar funny pictures

Now, the CARE I.M.E.F.s are dedicated to Defending the Faith against “[e]volution, empiricism, atheism, agnosticism, post-modernism, other religious worldviews, cults and the occult”.

Their “faith” they say, includes the idea that a “short time after the creation week, our first human parents willingly rebelled (sinned) against their creator and the consequence was death and decay.”

Lots more whatever this is after the break!

Read the rest of this entry »

Larry Dye, The Troglodyte Shakespeare Creation Guy! A Know Yer Nuts #3 Addendum!

I posted about Larry Dye “The Creation Guy” and his Creation Discovery Centre in Bow Island Alberta a few weeks ago as the third in my Know Yer Nuts series on Canadian anti-educationalism outfits. I noticed on his website that he said he had some training in the dramatic arts and wrote a few plays, but he didn’t give much information so I never passed it on. Well, one of his productions is apparently scheduled for well off Broadway release in November!

Genesis Theatre Group Presents:
A Night at the Museum Escape from the Mythonian

I did NOT find this picture at random on the internet. It is Larry's promo pic for the play. It might even be Larry.

I did NOT find this picture at random on the internet. It is Larry's promo pic for the play. It might even be Larry.

What does Neanderthal Man, Egyptian Queen Tiaa, and Pocahontas have in common? They all want to escape from the museum that houses lies. Will George, the museum worker, cooperate with their plan to reveal the truth about them and other exhibits? Will Phaoraoh prevent their escape?

The play runs Nov. 7, 8,  13, 14, 15, with 2 Saturday matinees. Tickets are $10.00 and are not available at the usual outlets.

Now, I’m not much of an art critic, but it is nice to see that someone with training at the Citadel Theatre isn’t about to write derivative works! Completely original, is Night at the Museum! As the site says, Larry offers his audiences a ”unique blend of creativity and humour, using scripture as a foundation”. Hell, you’re paying a ten-spot to go. You don’t expect anything less than that! Some of Larry’s other plays: Catastrophic Park and Storm Chaser.

I couldn’t find a list of the cast. Larry’s Genesis Theatre group should not be confused with the troupe of the same name in Ireland that worked with Roger Waters on a stage production of Pink Floyd’s The Wall.

So, who could be in Night at the Museum, escape from the mythonian?

Who would play Egyptian Queen Tiaa? What about the evil Pharoah?

Perhaps the Nelsons of Creation Truth Ministries of Red Deer (Know Yer Nuts #1).

Korelei and Vance Nelson of Creation Truth Ministries. Photo stolen from Creationwiki.

George? Hmmm, perhaps John Mackay, the screwball the Nelsons thought I should debate.

John Mackay from CreationWiki

John Mackay from CreationWiki

Mackay would be a good security guard.

He’s already used to wearing hats.

And as for Pocahontas? Who do we know from the creationists circles in Alberta who could be a convincing little girl? Would Harry Nibourg from the Big Valley Creation Science Museum fit the bill?

 

Harry Nibourg, from Profiles West.

Harry Nibourg, from Profiles West.

See a sample of Nibourg’s audition here.

And of course, any Night at the Museum play needs a freaking T.Rex! C’mon, Larry, where is the T. Rex?

barney

SO LETS HAVE SOME MUSIC! THE MISSING T. REX!

~~~~~~~~ On a related note~~~~~~~~

They are also running Home Schooling Creation Museum Tour in a few days (Oct. 8), and as far as I’m concerned that is damn despicable. Texts used for real schools have to be vetted and approved. I think other educational materials  etc. should also be vetted by the relevant educational authorities before they are allowed to be marketed to schools, whether those schools are proper ones with trained teachers or home schools with uneducated parents making sure the kids are insulated from the real world.

That was an editorial, by the way…


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Know Yer Nuts #4: Holy Prancing Pachyderms, Concerned Man!

Well, it didn’t take to long to find “Know Yer Nuts” number 4, and this time it isn’t a pack of creationists, its a pack of send-the-pachyderm-packingists!

www.babeled.com/2009/02/21

www.babeled.com/2009/02/21

Zoos are often criticized by animal rights and humanitarian groups for being, well, inhuman to the non-human. I don’t want to get into that debate here, but there is something far more insidious going on at the Calgary Zoo.

Yes, the Calgary Zoo is now engaging in Hindu proselytization! EEK!!!! And thanks to the latest superhuman, obstacle removing efforts of our fourth bunch of Known Nuts, the nefarious scheme has been discovered and publicized!

Image from CBC News

The Calgary Zoo is facing a few complaints by members of a Canadian Christian group over the presence of a statue of a dancing elephant based on the iconography of the Hindu god Ganesha. According to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation story:

A private donor gave the statue, modeled after the Hindu god Ganesh, to the zoo in 2006 to stand in front of the Asian elephant exhibit.

As CBC News first reported, Concerned Christians Canada sent a letter raising its concerns that the statue was “selective religious partiality” to the zoo on Thursday.

“A lot of people are saying we’re being intolerant. I don’t consider asking that the zoo look at this from a balanced perspective being intolerant,” said national chairman Jim Blake on Friday.

http://www.cbc.ca/gfx/images/news/topstories/2009/09/25/tp-cgy-jim-blake.jpg

http://www.cbc.ca/gfx/images/news/topstories/2009/09/25/tp-cgy-jim-blake.jpg

The Zoo has no intention of removing the statue. Good for the Zoo!

Zoo officials said the three-metre-tall statue has no religious symbols and is meant to simply show the link between elephants and Asian culture.

“Our desire in putting the statue here was to demonstrate to our visitors the connection between cultures and animals, much like the same way the bald eagle for example depicts the American culture, the lion Britain, the beaver Canada,” explained Grahame Newton, the zoo’s director of corporate services, on Friday.

Now, what the hell is so unreasonable about that? (clue: answer is “nothing”).

The Concerned Christians Canada outfit, however, has posted on their website an open letter to the Zoo’s administration (Sept. 24) labeled “Regarding Idols at Calgary Zoo”. To quote:

This letter is an official protest on the part of Calgarian Christians to the placement of a hindu “god” statue in the Calgary Zoo, in front of the Elephant Crossing Exhibit. Since the zoo is publicly funded by taxpayer dollars, the zoo is accountable to taxpayers, a segment of whom we represent.  The statue we are referencing is the statue of Ganesh, the Hindu “god” known to Hindus as “Lord of Beginnings and Lord of Obstacles”.

Notice that Blake can’t even refer to Ganesh as a Hindu god without putting the g-word in quotation marks. “Jesus Christ” man, grow up a little. I wonder what Blake would think if everyone starting putting quotation marks around references to the “Father”, the “Son” and the “Holy Ghost”, the “god” of “Christ”ianity.

man-in-elephant-ass

Mr. Blake would like the see the backside of the Calgary Zoo’s elephant.

Blake goes on to claim that the zoo is not a place for religious indoctrination. Displaying “different gods” is an “offence” to his and his coreligionists beliefs and “does not represent the diversity of views that should be reflected, if the zoo is embarking on teaching the public about world religions as they relate to the natural world.”

He adds that even atheists would be offended if the zoo took it upon itself to teach the diversity of religious beliefs. He then proposes that it is going to do that the zoo include creationist displays, a “Christ”ian cross, the Ten Commandments and Noah’s ark, adding that these would represent the view of Canada’s founding fathers and restore religious neutrality. Still, he writes, “The display of foreign gods is offensive”.

Well, whoopdee fucking do.

 

from wikipedia

from wikipedia

Some “gods” remove obstacles.

Apparently, all of the key talking points of fundamentalist Christian teachings need to be in place to balance a single elephant statue that really isn’t meant to be worshipped by anyone. There, dear readers, is the good old fashioned fundamentalist sectarian notion of neutrality and fair play: “You can say whatever you want so long as society gives us the means to drown you out.”

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com

One way to drown out the opposition. Tell a story.

Of course, the Hindus could respond by wanting an “idol” of EVERY ONE OF THEIR GODS. Take that, Trinity-guy!

Now, as an ”god” damn atheist, I’m not bothered by the statue’s presence on public property at all. Even if I paid taxes to support the zoo I wouldn’t be bothered (and I suppose they get grants from provincial or federal sources, so I probably do support it).

But really, is an Indian styled elephant statue really a “god”? It is an image in the image of other images, not an image of something its makers or owners are suggesting is an image of any kind of venerable cosmic force in the universe. Who made an “idol” of the statue? Jim Blake did that.

Image by foxtongue

Image by foxtongue

One person’s idol is another statue of a dead guy.

When I was a kid up in Edmonton (the non-evil version of Calgary), my folks would take me to Storyland Valley Zoo (now just called Valley Zoo) and a few of the smaller displays (fish if I remember correctly) were housed in a happily painted cement rendition of Noah’s ark.

Do I feel like I was victimized by an overt attempt at proselytization? Did these childhood experiences keep me from learning the truth about the God Delusion earlier? Were they to blame for the few years I spent in fundyville? Did they keep me from accepting Ganesh as my personal obstacle remover?

No. They didn’t do that. I’m not bitter at the zoo. I’m also not bitter at my schools for having nativity plays at Christmas, and if the Calgary zoo wants to have a nativity scene this winter with a petting zoo for the kids, so what? I don’t mind a bit.

 

Far Left Side (thanks to John V. for sending this cartoon to me)

Some “gods” need obstacles removed.

 

(thanks to John V. for sending this cartoon to me)

There is a big difference between a public institution adopting artistic and other elements from cultures around the world and actually promoting religion. Of course, promoting religion is exactly what the Concerned Christians Canada is all about. Blake writes:

Concerned Christians Canada (CCC) is; working at preserving Christian and parental freedoms, standing as a voice for the unborn and the afflicted, encouraging traditional family values, and pressing for moral leadership in all positions of authority and influence. CCC is also involved in speaking out for Christians who are being persecuted in Canada and speaking out for the rights of the poor.

Ah yes, the rights of Christians to keep their kids ignorant of science, to keep them homophobic, and keep Canada on the straight and narrow. The persecuted Christians! Poor things.

Maybe they should take a long hard look at their own “idol” of the poor dead slob on the cross. THAT is persecution for one’s beliefs. Having public servants being expected to respect the rights of those people who come to them with the expectation that they will fulfill the obligations of their office is not “persecution”.

Mind you, throwing Mr. Blake to the lions (or the elephants) at the Calgary Zoo would count as persecution too. But maybe not the squirrels. They like nuts.

scrat


Know Yer Nuts #3: Creation Discovery Centre

Here is Part Three of the Thinking Shop’s special feature on


Anti-Education in Canada,

“Know Yer Nuts”!


And just to make it three in a row, the crew that is driving me nuts this time around is the third creation centre in Alberta.

The Creation Discovery Centre

The CDC is to be found in sleepy little Bow Island, on Highway 3 between Lethbridge and Medicine Hat. It is part of the Bow Island Community Bible Church.

I’ve never been to the CDC, but my friend Cameron has been (a few years ago), but I don’t recall him being all that impressed. I wonder why.

Whereas the Creation Truth Ministries (Know Yer Nuts #1) and Big Valley Creation Science Museum (Know Yer Nuts #2) emphasize dinosaurs, (pseudo)biology, and so forth, the CDC is a little more outer spacey in orientation although they don’t ignore dinosaurs.

Apolloroom

The Apollo Capsule room at the Creation Discovery Centre. Pic from CreationWiki. Why #8? Because one of the astronauts talked about God on that mission. That proves that God made the universe (apparently).

According to the blurb on their website:

The Creation Discovery Centre is open for monthly events (see our calendar for dates and times) and tour bookings. See God’s creation through the eyes of Astronomy, Manned Spaceflight, and Dinosaurs! Book a tour at the Creation Discovery Centre for groups up to a maximum of 30 people; or book a creation speaker for your organization.

Linked from Creation Discovery Centre

Linked from Creation Discovery Centre

Nice sign. I think the unnamed person isthe chief researcher. Like most creationists with a spacey focus she was probably once a “top NASA scientist”. How many “top” scientists does NASA have? Has anyone ever asked them? Do they have “bottom scientists”, or middle ones?

Also not ignored is Noah’s ark. Notice that the brontosauruses are scientifically to scale. They are YOUNG brontosauruses. Also notice that there are two light grey elephants and one dark grey one, or is it a mastadon or mammoth? Did Noah take two of every species of elephant kind on board? Did he take two of every kind of insect?

Creation Discovery Center

Creation Discovery Center

Now, who would the Creation Speaker be?

LARRY DYE THE CREATION GUY!

CreationWiki says:

The Creation Guy has written and produced several full length plays including Catastrophic Park, Apollo 8 and the Storm Chaser. Larry Dye the Creation Guy brings a unique blend of creativity and humour, using scripture as a foundation for each presentation.
Larry Dye is a member and former director of the Sunridge Observatory (Medicine Hat Astronomy Club) and has developed space camps for the Medicine Hat College summer programs.

According to the blurb on CDC’s website Larry attended North American Baptist Divinity School (Taylor Seminary). This is the same institution that gave Vance Nelson of Creation Truth Ministries (see Know Yer Nuts #1) a degree in something. Taylor Seminary is still in operation, but its accompanying college has recently folded. Larry also graduated from the Northern Alberta Institute of Technology although he doesn’t say in what.

Creation Discovery Centre introduces “Larry Dye the Creation Guy”. Larry is a graduate of Northern Alberta Institute of Technology and North American Baptist Divinity School (Taylor Seminary). With a strong emphasis on apologetics and creationism, Larry has spoken extensively to churches, schools, science clubs, organizations, camps, libraries, and ministerials. His very first dinosaur presentation was at the Royal Tyrrell Museum. Larry has 17 years of ministry experience as a youth and outreach pastor. In addition, he has received training from Shiloh Training Institute, YWAM, and the Citadel Theatre.

That’s right, he has spoken at the Royal Tyrrell Museum! That is the real history of life museum in Alberta, and is one of the best in the world. I posted some of my pics from my August 2008 visit here.

Larry at the Tyrrell, from an old website Matchlok.
Larry at the Tyrrell, from an old website Matchlok.

I can’t find any description of what Larry said, how he said it, or how he ingratiated himself to the good folks there to let him have his say, or what they thought about what he said. Or whether he was ever invited back.

Maybe it went something like this:


Another old photo of Larry from Matchlok

Another old photo of Larry from Matchlok

Note the cool “I like to dress like I work for NASA even though I don’t really” jumpsuit with the astronautical shoulder patch. That means he KNOWS.

Larry Dye the Creation Guy on Creation Wiki

Larry, probably not at the Tyrrell. Is it the Big Valley Creation Science Museum? I seem to remember the overbite (not on Larry). See “Know Yer Nuts #2)

According to Creation Wiki, Larry likes to talk about (with added pictorial commentary by yours truly):

God and the Space Race

An out-of-this-world presentation on the history of the Space Race. Join Larry Dye the Creation Guy and characters such as Yuri the Cosmonaut, and Elvis, as they explain how God was glorified over man’s greatest adventure.

RUINS_cov

Great Dinosaur Mystery Solved

Ever wondered how dinosaurs fit in the Bible? This presentation unravels the mystery behind dinosaurs. Find out how scripture has answers to the most perplexing questions Palaeontologists have about Dinosaurs!

This movie requires Adobe Flash for playback.

Video from Yoism

Big Bang or Big God

Did the universe come about by a Big Bang or Big God. Find out how comets and galaxies reveal a young universe. Introduce yourself to Albert Einstein as he confirms that the Bible was right about our Solar System and universe. See how the heavens declare the glory of God.

Since I don’t have a mess of photos from the place to show you, I thought I would have a look at one of CDC’s articles. Just to show how scientific the place is. The article is about flying things, more specifically, honking great flying reptiles, which, according to the author, should not be able to fly at all.

I will assume Larry Dye the Creation Guy is the author but the article does not say it specifically. Anyway, Dye is advertising his public speaking services at the bottom of the piece. Now, what would Larry know about reptilian flight?

Hell, a guy with an astronaut suit can’t be wrong about flying things, can he? Of course not, if he’s

larry5LARRY DYE THE CREATION GUY!

Genesis answers huge flying reptile problem

pterosaur-580x435Photo from Discovery Channel.

Basically, the problem is how the really big pterosaurs, the ones I’ve already discussed in Know Yer Nuts #2 that closely resembled ugly French giraffes, got their huge bodies off the ground without plummeting to the ground like unclever sheep.

Quite obviously, they were a heck of a lot bigger than your average albatross. Could such creatures generate enough power to fly? The problems “evolutionists” have in explaining the physics of giant ass reptilian giraffe flight are all explained by Dye by reference to Genesis.

Genesis 1:6-8 reveals that the original atmosphere on earth was different than it is today. It speaks of water not only being on the earth but above the atmosphere.

6 And God said, “Let there be an expanse between the waters to separate water from water.” 7 So God made the expanse and separated the water under the expanse from the water above it. And it was so. 8 God called the expanse “sky.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the second day.

This water canopy above the expanse or sky would be the hard ceiling which would cause the air pressure to be substantially greater. Scientists now believe that the air pressure during the time of the dinosaurs would have had to be about twice the levels of today. Why is this important?

Dye explains the importance by claiming that without the Earth’s air pressure being well above current levels, large dinosaurs could not breath (their lungs being too inefficient and their “long necks” being “too long to reach their lungs”) and that the big pterosaurs would have been unable to generate enough lift in to get airborne. This, he says is well known. But what about his “solution”?

They needed a heavier atmosphere to get enough air to lift them with their 30 to 40-foot wingspans. The system revealed in Genesis 1:6-8, would have provided the heavier atmospheric pressure necessary for the flight of these huge creatures. Evolutionists say we don’t know how these giant reptiles could have flown in our atmosphere. To the Creation scientist, this is not a problem. Before the water canopy came down at the flood of Noah’s day, it would have provided the air density needed for these huge creatures to fly.

Now, how the hell does this work? How could the water above the “expanse” exert pressure on the air without simply falling through it and falling as a freaking big rain storm unless the “expanse” was somehow a material hard enough to keep the water suspended but elastic enough to allow its weight to compress the air caught between it and the flat earth.  Dye ignores that but sees the water itself as the “hard ceiling”. How the fuck is water a “hard ceiling”, unless it was ice? If it was ice, then it might not exert any pressure at all on the atmosphere. Think of an igloo.Maybe it was a wobbly igloo, but that’s hardly the product of a perfect God.

But Dye is not a very good Bible guy, because the Bible doesn’t really call the water the “hard ceiling”. The ceiling is the “expanse” itself but that term really misses most of the nuances of the Hebrew word raqi’a used in Genesis 1, 6, 8.

This is not so much  a simple expanse, but a shell, in the words of other translations, a “firmament”. The one thing about firmaments that needs to be recognized here is that they are firm. Not squishy. Not wobbly. The word comes from a verb meaning to “beat out”, i.e., like a copper kettle. In biblical cosmology, that is the sky. Something solid, keeping the cosmic waters above it from reaching earth, unless His Yahwehness opens its “windows” (see Genesis 7:11).

cosmology

Of course, Dye, being a space cadet, knows the world is not flat but more or less spherical. So, the biblical cosmology is wrong, unless one supposes that the firm firmament is also more or less spherical. But this is no solution either.

Think of Big Valley Creation Science Museum’s Argument from Submarines in which it is claimed that some deep sea shell fish have round shells like submarines to be able to withstand the water pressure.

IDF subGo here to launch one of your own.

The round shells allow the critters to have an internal gas pressure substantially lower than the outside water pressure. Just like a submarine. Since submarines are designed, so are the shelled critters. Its a rubbish argument, of course, but for a spherical earth the firmament must be like  a submarine hull, resisting pressure.

It is interesting the Dye prefers the translation that reads “expanse” even though it totally defeats his case. It might be just that Dye isn’t smart enough to notice this, but remember, he has a space suit. Dye has a bigger problem, however. If the sky is a solid firmament, where the hell is it now? We have gone beyond the atmosphere and found that the sun and moon, rather than being embedded in a solid firmament above the air, are higher still, with other heavenly bodies (see T-shirt ad above) even higher. He is caught between a rock and a firmament.

As far as how the big pterosaurs flew, we need a better explanation. But I bet if people looked, there would be one that doesn’t require ephemerally firm BS and a lot of water to make things fly. For the interested, try this as a basic place to start:

http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/vertebrates/flight/pter.html

This is the alternative:

me262shark

Now, before anyone gives up on Bow Island as a whole, I should call your attention to the fact that this little wee town has a bit of reputation in Alberta for having a great venue for the Blues, and it hosts some great acts. I haven’t been yet (I’m looking for a designated driver), but hopefully that little shortcoming in my social life will be filled soon. Go to “Blues at the Bow“.

Know Yer Nuts! Big Valley Creation Science Museum

WELL, ITS THAT TIME AGAIN!
TIME FOR THINGS THAT

DRIVE DR. JIM NUTS

All Sorts 018BVCSM

The little museum that couldn’t in the Big Valley that shouldn’t of which one visitor from Montana says:

“I spent more time in this museum than I did in the Smithsonian”

All Sorts 017

I posted some of my Royal Tyrrell Museum photos a few days ago, and promised to post some of the pics I took at the BVCS museum that is only a short drive away. Well, here they are.

Last August, I went to the RTM and BVCSM along with my good friends Mary, Natasha and Annabree and we had a great time. Some of us didn’t want to give the BVCSM any money but heck, it was only $5.00 and given all the laughs we got out of it, I think it was money well wasted.

Big Valley is pretty prairie village and have a nicely done website. Its a nice place and if you are touring Alberta, don’t avoid it just because of the creationists!

Big Valley (pic from the town’s website)

All Sorts 015

Lots of grain elevators like this used to dot the prairies. They are rapidly disappearing as more grain farmers are taking the stairs for the exercise.


All Sorts 016

St. Edmonds is a pretty blue church on the hill overlooking the town. I did find out which denomination, but I can’t remember (Anglican, I think). Notice the old Union Jack.

The nicest way to get to Big Valley is on the train, but we drove.


The Alberta Prairie Railway runs from Stettler to Big Valley. The train arrived when we were there, but I didn’t a good picture of it. This was the best I could do. Alas. It gets bigger (not better) if you click it.

All Sorts 040

So, Lets go to the Museum!

All Sorts 019

A Soffitsaurus? (Velocirafter?)

All Sorts 020

I was surprised at how nice some of the dinosaur models were. No idea what this is supposed to be. I think it would regard me as lunch.

All Sorts 023

I had something like that living in the gunk in the sink with my dirty dishes once. I moved.

NOW, THE STUFF YOU’VE ALL BEEN WAITING FOR!

It is all the standard stuff that has been refuted a thousand times.

One of the things that figures prominently in the BVCSM is “evidence” for recent dinosaurs.

I wasn’t sure how many pics I could fit in my camera, so I snapped shots of the text but not the displays since similar images are available online. I wanted to preserve the claims made in all of their scientific glory.

Where to begin? Let’s go with the Cambodian “Stegosaurus”

cambodiandinoPinched this photo from here.

It sort of looks like a stegasaurus but what about the big horns on the tail? The head is also way too big. What seem to be plates on the back look like they may be a continuation of the decorations around the spiral form that surrounds the image.

Anyhoo, the BVCSM spins the usual spin, and here is my pic of it. If you can’t read the text, click the pic for a bigger image.

All Sorts 028

Dinosaurs: only 800 years ago. If that was the case why the heck didn’t the Khymer people make LOTS of images of them, instead of only one! Gee, they covered their temples with pictures and only one stegosaurus?Notice the last line in the text above, hitting home the idea that Darwin abandoned the book of “Truth”. The problem is that the Bible doesn’t refer to dinosaurs at all. Anyone who tells you different is simply reading into it what they want to find.

NEXT!

Apparently some native americans saw a pterosaur and were pterrified into panic-stricken fit of petrogyphing. Here is what the museum says (again, you can zoom in, or swoop in, as the case may be).

All Sorts 029

Ok, so Darwin only had a theology degree. In those days, fields like biology paleontology and so forth were not the intensely specialized disciplines that they are now. That Darwin did not have a science degree would not have raised many eyebrows. He certainly took his place in the company of scientists, however, and was hardly a marginalized voice. No, he paid his educational dues.

So, back to pterosaurs. This appears to be the same picture as the museum has. The site I found it on has the same book quoted.

Now, according to our museum text, this petroglyph shows a quetzalcoatlus or something similar. It is easy to see how one might make that mistake. It is all a matter of perspective. Of course, a  quetzalcoatlus looks nothing like that. Here is a quetzalcoatlus (on the left).

quetzacoalt

Notice that it more closely resembles an ugly ass giraffe with a big nose wearing a crumpled artiste’s beret. What the hell is on that rock? Who knows.

Here is another example of the same kind of thing.

The Katchina Bridge petroglyphs.

All Sorts 031

OK, I won’t bother trying to find a picture of this picture on the bridge, but get a load of this sentence, spanning the two columns:

It is for this reason (the existence of a patina on the image) that the authenticity of this petroglyph is not questioned by the evolutionary experts on rock art.

Now, I don’t know if the claim about the patina is true or not, but even if it is Jumpin’ Jebus B. Gobley, Petrolman! Since when is the study of rock art a part of evolutionary science?  So what if the patina is there and the freakin’ picture is ancient? Why trust a sign that that displays no conception of the boundaries of evolutionary science?

And more…

All Sorts 030

havasupaiHere’s a photo of the “dinosaur” I nicked from badarchaeology.com

Here is their explanation

For a start, the picture of the pictograph says a great deal. Firstly, it is reproduced without context; we are not shown other figures from the same rock-face or others from the canyon, against which it might be possible to evaluate it. Is the picture reproduced the right way up? Even allowing that it is, what does it show? There is an outline that somewhat resembles a Tyrannosaurus, but there are problems with the tail, the length of the neck and the lack of front legs. The idea that Tyrannosaurs dragged their tails along the ground may have been current in the 1920s, but it has not been believed for many years now, so if the pictogram really does show a giant meat-eating dinosaur, we need to explain why it is depicted in an incorrect position. A more economical hypothesis is that the pictogram shows something else that bears a slight resemblance to the way Tyrannosaurs were once thought to have looked. It is certainly not evidence that the artist had seen a living Tyrannosaur.

And here is the argument from submarines (eek!).
Stay tuned, it’s a good one
.

All Sorts 043

Sorry about the lousy picture quality. It might be readable if you expand the picture. The gist of it goes like this. Ammonite lives deep in the sea where the water pressure is very high. The shell that contains “buoyancy chambers” is rounded which allows it to withstand the pressure. This is the same way submarines can dive deeply. Submarines are designed. So too were ammonites.


Clearly, if ammonites were not busying themselves millions of years ago evolving a deep sea capable shell, they would not have gotten too far evolving a deep sea lifestyle, now would they? And since when does evolution rule out “round?”. That submarine designers discovered that round things take pressure better than flat sides things is completely besides the point.

And now, DNA is explained (away?)

All Sorts 039

This is really hard to read unless it is expanded to its full size. Here is the gist of it.

1. The claimed 98.4% match between human and chimpanzee DNA is the product of ignoring large portions of the genome of both species that did not match.

2. Chimp DNA is around 10% longer than human DNA

3. Chimp Chromosomes have a “B2″ sequence at the end, unlike humans

4. Similarities are explainable by a designer employing similar patters in two bits of work.

5. Error correction mechanisms within DNA prevent (at least a lot of) fatal mistakes in replication, and, therefore, something turning into a different species.

6. DNA errors are disorders, not “increases in complexity” and increased “information”.

7. Evolutionists cannot explain increases in DNA complexity.

8. Protiens and their interactions are too complex to have evolved and the whole system is needed for any part of it work.

My companion Annabree knows a lot more about DNA than I or the people who put this display together do, so lets not quibble. But

One would have thought that if the accepted methodology into research about DNA was as badly corrupted as indicated here, scientific discussion of the great similarity between human / chimpanzee DNA would not have seen the light of day. Are all of these scientists dumb or in cahoots? What we have here is not really an argument but a conspiracy theory. And do scientists who study DNA use terms like “complexity” and “information” in the same way creationists do?

tarzan

Relationships ALWAYS increase in
complexity when you add a chimp.

Anyway, when we visited last year, the guy who ran the place was talking to another fellow about chimp DNA and they agreed that it was nothing similar to human DNA (how do they know that?). One guy said “I’ve never seen a blue eyed ape”. I just about peaked out from around the corner and said “Now you have!” But I didn’t.

All Sorts 032

Now, sometimes stalactites and stalagmites grow fast in man made caves. The fastest growing ones are those most like the natural growing ones. Therefore, all dating of caves by measuring these things is necessarily false. Just makes sense, doesn’t it?

All Sorts 034

The Fossil sequence is wrong. Of course, that the peer reviewed science literature suppresses any notice of this only shows the scale of the conspiracy. They are probably in cahoots with people running Area 51, the communists who fluoridated our water, and folks who faked the moon landings.

There were lots of other things, like near instantly fossilized boots, claims that, since some species seem not to have evolved at all over millions of years, nothing ever evolved. All of it has been refuted again and again.

“Evolution doesn’t happen” we are told because modern Brittle Stars look like Brittle Stars from ages ago.

All Sorts 025

Yeah, right, the Theory of Evolution says that everything must evolve at exactly the same rate. It’s right there on page 37, discussing ferns:

All Sorts 026

And, of course, the ONLY flood that could have caused fossilization is Noah’s flood. Of course, who would doubt that?

But this last thing really stand out:

EVIDENCE FROM GENEALOGY

All Sorts 021

YUP, Old Henry the Sixth, whose power comes from the church had some church trained scribes trace his lineage and they got it all the way back to Adam proves the Bible is right. Yeah, right.

Well, anyway, dear readers, there it is, the Big Valley Creation Museum. Doesn’t it make you want to give up your real education?

Kind makes me wish I had a chance to go to the Smithsonian.

Don’t it just drive you NUTS?

Don’t forget to visit my related posts, Know Yer Nuts 1, and some rational comments made by an unhappy customer. I turned his comment to KYN1 into a separate post.

KNOW YER NUTS Pt. 1: Creation Truth Ministries/ Alberta Dinosaur Museum

scrat

Here is a new feature on Dr. Jim’s!

Know Yer Nuts


This is a when-ever-I-get-around-to-it series of posts on Canadian based creationists, general purveyors of silliness, pseudo-academia, right wing anti-social commentary, and fundamental dipwittery.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The observant among you may also note that I have a new link category to the right,

Danger! Head may explode”.  If you know of any other “interesting” Canadian and especially Albertan sites that might fit there, please let me know!


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

So, our Number One Nuts are the good folks at:

Creation Truth Ministry

&

Alberta Dinosaur Museum

Korelei and Vance Nelson

CTM is to be found in Red Deer, Alberta and elsewhere. According to Creationwiki (yup, it exists) Vance and his Mrs. have the largest traveling creation museum in Canada.

busNote the complete absence of atheist adverts.

Needless to say, these are young earth creationists. Here is what they say about their museum. A few things I’ve highlighted, just for fun.

Creation Museum Traveling Exhibits

CTM also makes available a wide selection of displays. These displays include around fifty authentic museum quality fossils. Among other things, two different dinosaur eggs from China will be on display (Hadrosaur, Segnosaur/Therizinosaur). Many museum quality fossil replicas will also be displayed.

We will bring such things as two eight foot long fossil cabinets filled with museum quality genuine fossils.  We also have a 1:87 scale model of Noah’s ark, a full size Coelophysis dinosaur cast, a T. rex footprint replica, and a full size Mosasaurus sp. skull cast.  We will also bring Three realistic dinosaur models – a Triceratops (9 1/2 feet long), a Raptor (about 4 1/2 feet tall), and a T. rex (8 feet long). Included in our displays is a wonderful ten-foot wide display of many pictures of evidence that provide powerful positive support of Biblical creation. More displays are in the plans. These displays are assembled neatly and professionally. They are wonderful education tools.

noahs-ark

1/87 scale? That’s pathetic! The Dutch contractor Johan Huibers’ model is a little bigger than 1/2. And Holland is such a little place. Can Canada live down the shame?

Well, that’s fair enough. One shouldn’t expect anything else, should one? But here is interesting thing. Their site has a couple pictures of a model coelacanth. A “living fossil” fish that didn’t evolve so nothing did. The caption, however, claims that the model is on loan from the Alberta Dinosaur Museum.

Coelacanth1Coelacanth. It does not evolve because…

Before anyone gets their boxers in a bunch (there will be an opportunity for that, later) and howls about a legitimate science museum loaning genuine imitation coelacanths to creationist institutions.

CeilingcreatorCeiling Cat creates.

Don’t worry. Alberta Dinosaur Museum is NOT the Royal Tyrrell Museum in Drumheller.

All Sorts 083The Royal Tyrell Museum does not have the Creation Truth™

Oh no. Alberta Dinosaur Museum is completely different. And guess who is its director and curator? Yup, you guessed it, Mr. Nelson. Who really gives a hoot if Nelson has two fossil displays easily confused? I don’t. Can’t people have two jobs? Of course, but when we look at Nelson’s credentials and how he markets the two exhibits, we may start bunching our boxers.

knickersI say, indeed!

Here is what the CTM website says about Vance Nelson.

Vance Nelson is the director of CTM. He holds two earned degrees. He earned a theology degree from Taylor University College in 1997 (Bachelor of Religion with a specialization in Christian ministry). Vance then went on to earn a Biology degree in 2002.  Since 2002 Vance has been researching, speaking and writing full-time. Vance spends much of his time doing original research in areas such as paleontology, geology and archaeology.

CreationWiki adds,

Vance also earned a science degree in 2002 (Bachelor of Science in biology). Vance has also studied concepts relating to creation and evolution at the college level (10 credit-hours directly relating to origin science).

Holy Jebus B. Gobley™ Education Man! TEN credit hours! That is one for every freaking commandment! Well, that makes him an expert on biology, doesn’t it? Ah, but he does “original research in paleontology, geology and achaeology” so that makes him a scientismist, doesn’t it. Without even having actually studied any of it. He rocks.

BS

Indeed, he must be flushed with pride.

But wait, there’s more!

CTM’s director has been privileged to work with one of the world’s leading creation researchers, John Mackay.  Both John and Vance love rocks and fossils and the tremendous evidence they exhibit for creation and the flood and ultimately the historicity of the Bible.  John and Vance have worked together in the United States, Canada and the U.K.

If you would like to support original creation research and speaking with an evangelistic emphasis, please go to our Donate/Payments page… (CTM site).


Here is what Alberta Dinosaur Museum says about him.

Vance Nelson is the director and curator of The Alberta Dinosaur Museum. He was inspired to create a traveling dinosaur museum through the influence of one of his friends who had been doing the same for ten years. After graduating with his second degree in 2002, He began to put the traveling museum together. Three years later the museum continues to grow. Vance received a B. Sc. in Biology while in Florida in 2002. Vance is well educated in the biological sciences by training, but is also a paleontologist by passion.

Vance also has an incredible passion for dinosaur and fossils. He is well aquainted [sic] with multitudes of Genus and Species names for many many fossils. The Alberta Dinosaur Museum is an overflow from the passion Vance has everyday of his life about this subject. The children and adults alike will be amazaed [sic] at the fossils, the casts, the models, and the fantastic illustrated talks.

It seems that ADM’s site is about 5 years out of date. Hopefully it is out of business. But here is my real point:

Jumpin’ Jolly Jehovah Biscuits! A BSc is “well educated”?  But hey, he knows the names of a bunch of fossils! But this is what really gets me. There seems to be NO MENTION of creationism on the ADM site (or evolution for that matter). Here is part of the sales pitch:

Vance Nelson (a.k.a. Dr. Fossil) is the director of this unique museum. Vance has training in the biological sciences and has had a long-term passion for fossils and dinosaurs. The museum is designed to work with either a guided tour or as a stand-alone museum. Vance can also give exciting and educational talks to children and adults alike about dinosaurs and fossils.


Educational. With 10 course credits (from where?) in “life origins” and no paleontology. And he calls himself DOCTOR FREAKING FOSSIL? MY SHATTERED NERVES!

panicBut wait, there’s more!

The Alberta Dinosaur Museum offers a wide range of programs. We can do birthday parties, malls, schools – just about any venue

...

Package #1 (Schools):

This package would be perfect for schools. This package includes the entire Traveling Dinosaur Museum. Two eight-foot tables of additional real dinosaur bones, dinosaur casts, and dinosaur models are also included. Special informative & exciting dinosaur talks are also available for Kindergarten through grade 12 (one day’s worth). Vance Nelson, the director, will also be available for guided tours as is required by the school.

SCHOOLS? The audacity of this guy is unbelievable. On the one hand he peddles his wares to schools as “educational”, without specifiy much about his own point of viewand then, through CTM, advertises three day “Creation Truth Seminars” listing topics that include:

Dinosaurs, The Bible & The 21st Century: The Most Asked Questions Answered

Dragons: The Missing Link in Dinosaur History

Biology: The Fingerprints of God

Geologic Processes & The Age of the Earth

Digging up the Fossils: Evidence for Creation & The Flood

The Brief History of Mankind (Evidence for the Tower of Babel Dispersion)

I might be wrong, but is this guy trying to sneak creationism into schools? Sure kids will have fun looking at the displays and messing around digging up planted fossils (sort of like cleaning a cat’s box), and they might learn a little here and there, but the real issue for education is evolution. I think people should be wary of such crypto religious businesses, and don’t just assume that all traveling dinosaur show are created equal.

Know yer nuts, I always say.

Oh well. If you can’t trust the nomadic museums to tell you about the ancient world, there are always the cinematic arts.

BikgNo coelacanths were harmed in the making of this movie.

DON’T MISS THE POST DEALING WITH ONE OF THE COMMENTS.


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,