Could it be that he is simply misunderstood?
Posted on February 10, 2011 at 8:51 am by Dr. Jim
Posted on February 8, 2011 at 7:22 pm by Dr. Jim
A couple of days ago I posted on some silly anti-climate change comment in the Lethbridge Herald.
Today the debate which had been running in the readers’ letters page for the past little while and to which my friend Dan added a “Public Professor” column last Saturday, continued.
First, a rather sensible Stephen McGlenn went after Big Oil and defended the IPCC’s integrity from attacks by two previous letter writers. An excerpt:
The disappointingly inadequate and unsupported arguments they proclaim seem to be more informed by an anti-intellectual bias and ingrained distrust of climate scientists. Where does that stem from, may I ask? How do they explain the support of the IPCC from institutions like NASA, the Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society, the Canadian Geophysical Union, the Canadian Association of Physicists, the Canadian Society of Soil Science, the Canadian Society of Zoologists; need I go on? Please don’t disappoint me with wild and worn-out conspiracy theories of research funding schemes and world government grabs for power. Need I remind them the IPCC is a voluntary organization with only 10 paid staff persons?
But on the same page, this bit of pure GENIUS! (printed in its entirety)
Even if CO2 can be linked to climate change as Mr. Sandilands wants us to believe (Letter to the Editor, Herald, Feb. 2), worldwide temperature records don’t go back to the last ice age. Many scientists actually believe that the Earth was warmer then than now.
OK, let’s assume the connection is proven. How many people lived on the Earth 300 years ago? Maybe one or two billion? Now there are three to four times that many. Human beings breathe out CO2. That alone already quadruples the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. Who wants to stop breathing to offset what Mr. Sandilands breathes out every day?
THE ICE AGE WAS WARMER? WTF?
Who the FUCK is suggesting that people stop breathing? Who says the only CO2 in the atmosphere is from humans exhaling?
Dave, this is for you:
Jeez, for the sake of the children, do some READING before you write. Try this:
Posted on February 8, 2011 at 2:00 pm by Dr. Jim
Posted on February 8, 2011 at 7:14 am by Dr. Jim
Apparently, one is to name their most disliked hymn. I’m an atheist. I should be spoiled for choice. But I’m not.
I HARDLY KNOW ANY!
Well, I’ve heard lots and the vast majority drove me crazy, but I can’t really remember how any of them go. And as for the qualification that the tune has to be in a current hymnal, I’m really borked.
One of the few exceptions to my lack of hymnal literacy is Amazing Grace, and as music goes, I don’t like it, because it is too, well…. bag-pipey… but since I also associate it with my dad’s funeral, it is off-limits for me to publicly denounce. Ironically, some things are sacred, in a non-sacred kind of way.
On a happier note, I know Swing Low Sweet Chariot, but only because I really like Eric Clapton’s reggae infused version of it.
And then there is “Jerusalem”, but then that has a Monty Python connection, so it is actually pretty good.
What bugs me about a lot of hymns is the fake KJV language and screwed up word order in lots that I have vague memories of.
Here’s an example I conjoured up on the internet.
Be Thou my Vision, O Lord of my heart;
Naught be all else to me, save that Thou art
Thou my best Thought, by day or by night,
Waking or sleeping, Thy presence my light.
But if I was to pick one it would have to be the one this church I went to for a little while would sing. All about wallowing in blood. I can’t remember how it goes (the human mind tends to block out traumatic, violent experiences). Anyway, I found this online and if it isn’t the same one, it is close:
Are you washed in the blood,
In the soul cleansing blood of the Lamb?
Are your garments spotless? Are they white as snow?
Are you washed in the blood of the Lamb?
Eucharist or Baptism? Bathing in the Blood of the Lamb
Pretty morbid, eh?
Posted on February 7, 2011 at 7:48 pm by Dr. Jim
Ah, yes, the Lethbridge Herald. Dr. Jim’s local newspaper (with the lousiest delivery reliability on record, but that’s a different story), and home of the Public Professor column started by myself and Dan Johnson, who does enviro-sciency-insect and crop stuff in the Dept. of Geography. The Herald is also home of the “Roasted and Toasted” feature every Monday, which is not online, but would fit in just fine with the rest of the internet.
Reading it is a guilty pleasure, but as I was telling my lovely Mary (Dr. Jim’s current Better Brain and future Mrs. Dr. Jim) just this morning, it is reassuring to discover just how many dweebs there are in the world. Makes one feel better about oneself, and on a Monday morning, that’s a good thing.
Anyway, it is a perfectly anonymous collection of newpapery tweet-like submissions by readers saying what or who they like or dislike. Most of the “Toasts” go to people who have returned wallets, shovelled neighbour’s sidewalks and the like. Roasts go to bad drivers, lousy restaurants, and various anonymous persons with disgusting habits. Almost all of the roasts feature a shocking lack of detail which makes the complaint pointless. The writer’s name is also withheld, so really, its sort of stupid, just a lot of venting without any accountability or even direction to the spew. But I suppose it makes some people feel good, not to mention empowered behind their wall of anonymity.
Here is a roast from this morning that is pretty representative:
“Roast: the RCMP for not patrolling the school zones more often”. There are of course, many more than three school zones in Lethbridge, and the RCMP have no jurisdiction in town anyway, so this is obviously NOT about Lethbridge but one of the outlying towns. But which one? If I was the RCMP officer responsible for policing all the little town around here, how would I know which town needs a better allocation of resources?
But here is the one that really got my attention!
“This”, as they say, “isn’t even wrong”.
So, folks concerned about the climate are to be associated with the 2012 end of the world crowd are they? On the contrary, it is the climate change denier do-nothings who are more analogous to the anti-rational Mayan-prophecy-out-the-ass doom-sayers. And WTF is this CO2 promotes life so it’s good B.S.? Hell, water promotes life too, but tell that the folks who went down on the Titanic! Too much oxygen can kill you as can too much food.
Perhaps the “Roast” was in response to Dan’s Public Professor published on Saturday. Here is the first bit.
Arguments Against Global Warming Hardly Based on Fact
Is a new ice age on the way despite evidence of global warming? Interestingly enough, we may have been on the verge of a new ice age, until it was averted by recent warming. So, a little climate change was not a bad thing, but the current data and the projections indicate that we are about to seriously overdo it. Some people dispute the warming. Is this position based on the facts?
Graphs and articles (mainly from the Internet) have been distributed claiming that historical data shows no warming in recent history, and that present annual temperatures are lower than in the past. I was sent some such graphs recently, and recognized the graphs as being plots of Greenland ice core isotope data used to reconstruct annual average temperatures during the last 50,000 years. Anyone can download this climate data from NOAA (U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). It appears that some have, and then severely misinterpreted it.
When I graphed the data myself, I realized that what the climate change denier author of the “cooling” graph was using as “recent” data ended in the 1800s! This is because ice slowly accumulates from snow. Data of this kind gives the values for 95 years before a “zero” year, and the zero year may be 1950, or another starting point. Recent data (not dependent on ice cores) is collected at weather stations such as at Angmagssalik, Greenland. This weather station shows the same pattern of recent, rapid warming since the 1970s that is found in other weather station records.
But does it matter what one coring site or one weather station tells us? Greenland is not representative of the entire planet surface, and scientists consider the “global” average heat value. Top scientist James Hansen and colleagues recently noted in a 2010 update that the rate of warming has not declined, despite year-to-year fluctuations.
But of course, it is all lost on Mr. Anonymous Know It All.
Posted on February 7, 2011 at 4:36 pm by Dr. Jim
According to the Calgary Herald, The Church of the Universe, a religious outfit in Toronto that smoked pot to get get closer to God got busted and the charges stuck. A constitutional defence was made claiming that the law interfered with their religious freedom.
[Superior Court Judge Thea] Herman wrote that while she felt both Styrsky and Kharaghani were sincere in their beliefs about the spiritual power of marijuana, laws against possession and trafficking were reasonable limits on their religious freedoms.
“The limits are proportional because there is no feasible way to make an allowance for the religious use of cannabis in the circumstances of this case,” she wrote, dismissing the pair’s proposal that the government should introduce a licensing system for religions that find spiritual meaning in smoking weed, such as Rastafarianism.
Further, she felt that the church’s membership process, in which followers signed a single-line declaration of faith and paid a small fee, was open to abuse by those with less-than-holy ambitions.
Well, good for the judge I say. The issue here is NOT whether pot should or should not be legalized but , given that it is illegal, whether some people should get exemptions from the law on religious grounds. Needless to say, I don’t thing they should.
Religion’s privilege status is wholly unjustified. Why should a legal system validate dope smoking to get in touch with a god and not just to have a damn good time after a stressful day?
Of course, exemptions for medical purposes is another thing entirely. Many medicines are strictly controlled and marijuana should be as well, controlled and yet available for those who can really benefit from its medicinal properties.
Posted on February 7, 2011 at 12:46 pm by Dr. Jim