who got himself really quite famous
Said we’re unjust
Leave Bethel he must
For predicting that Yahweh will flame us.
Posted on March 24, 2014 at 11:48 am by Dr. Jim
My talk in Edmonton on Wall-E and Silent Running went very well. Jessica Swann was a great organizer and host, we have a very good turnout, and no one threw tomatoes at me! Who could ask for more?
It was great to see the U of Alberta crew again, Ehud, Francis, Jessica, Mike, John, Ian, etc. Had a good lunch with Jessica and Ehud, and wonderful dinner at 9th Street Cafe with a fun crowd including Mike Kok, and Peter Sabo.
The drive up to Edmonton was gruelling, with blowing snow, ice, and idiots all over the road. The trip back was much better although the snow was flying again south of Calgary.
Posted on March 18, 2014 at 5:53 pm by Dr. Jim
This Friday (March 21), starting at 3:00 pm in L-2 of the Humanities Building
This is hopefully the final pre-publication version of the paper I’ve been playing with over the past year. My thanks to Jessica Swann of the U. of Alberta Religious Studies Grad Students Society for the invite and the organizing of everything!
The 1972 film, Silent Running (dir. Douglas Trumbull) and the 2008 hit animated feature, Wall-E (dir. Andrew Stanton), revolve around themes of a future Earth unable to support vegetation. Both films freely adapt Genesis’s stories of paradise and Noah’s ark, albeit to different ends. Neither film is a warning about the death of humanity because of environmental damage, but a call to “enlightenment”, i.e., to knowledge of a true relationship between nature and humanity. Yet, both films undermine this truth even as it is asserted as they seemingly put an ignorant humanity in the place of a deity as creators of robots that carry “true” human ideals.
Silent Running is set aboard one of a number of giant spacecraft housing the last remnants of Earth’s forests. The story revolves around a crew member, Freeman Lowell, and the ship’s three robots (Huey, Dewey, and Louie). Enraged by an order to destroy the forest-domes so that the ship can return to commercial use, Lowell murders his crew-mates. Before committing suicide, he leaves one forest-dome in the care of Dewey. Silent Running’s idealistic but disturbing hero is both Adam and Cain but also God, in appointing Dewey to biblical Adam’s task of preserving the garden.
The 2008 hit animated feature, Wall-E stars an earth-bound machine and his robotic romantic interest, Eve. Wall-E is a kind of inverted Adam figure, cleaning up the planet after it was abandoned by humans until vegetation can grow again. Again, humanity is in no danger of extinction although they are unknowingly in the control of a computer system that does not want an Exodus back to earth. With children in its intended audience, Wall-E is a far more optimistic film.
The two films “humanize” the robots with emotions and they become idealized humans charged with a “sacred” mission on behalf of “natural” humanity. The films appear to be asking whether people can live up to the human potential of their own creations. As creators, however, humans assume the role of gods, but the two films differ on the potential of humanity to be restrained by the products of its own ingenuity.
Posted on March 10, 2014 at 8:16 am by Dr. Jim
Biblical Scholar Hector Avalos will be addressing the “historical” Jesus debate as part of Free Thought Arizona’s day of activities on March 16 at the Duval Auditorium. University of Arizona, Tucson AZ (10:30 AM-Noon).
Here is the blurb.
Scholars of Jesus usually divide themselves into Jesus historicists and Jesus mythicists. Historicists believe that there was a real historical person behind the Jesus of the Gospels even if there are many legendary additions to his biography. The historicists have an overwhelming majority, and include Bart Ehrman, a self-described agnostic, and virtually all Christian scholars. The mythicist position is a minority, and includes Robert Price, Earl Doherty, and Frank Zindler. They hold that Jesus is a completely fictional character, and perhaps originally part of a mystery religion. This lecture demonstrates that there is too little information from the time of Jesus to favor either side conclusively, and so agnosticism is the best position until more relevant new data can be acquired.
Biography: Dr. Hector Avalos is Professor of Religious Studies at Iowa State University, where he was named Professor of the Year in 1996, and a Master Teacher in 2003-04. A former fundamentalist preacher and faith healer born in Nogales, Sonora, Mexico, Dr. Avalos is now one of the few openly atheist biblical scholars in academia. Avalos received a B.A. in Anthropology from the University of Arizona in 1982, and a Master of Theological Studies from Harvard Divinity School in 1985. In 1991, he became the first Mexican American to earn a Ph.D. in Hebrew Bible and Near Eastern Studies at Harvard. He is the author or editor of nine books, including Fighting Words: The Origins of Religious Violence (2005), The End of Biblical Studies (2007), and Slavery, Abolitionism, and the Ethics of Biblical Scholarship(2011).
This event is sponsored by FreeThought Arizona and will be held at DuVal Auditorium
A number of secular biblical scholars are doing this sort of thing now. As I noted earlier, Zeba Crook is debating Richard Carrier in Ottawa’s Centrepointe Chamber Theatre, Saturday, April 5, 2014, 7:30-10:00 pm.
Posted on February 23, 2014 at 3:33 pm by Dr. Jim
The Center For Inquiry in Ottawa is hosting a debate on the Historical/Mythical Jesus! Zeba Crook, professor of religious studies at Carleton University and the famous “there was no Jesus” historian and philosopher, Richard Carrier, are airing their contrary views on the subject on April 5!
“Zeba Crook did a BA in Political Science at UBC, while running on the Canadian National Track and Field Team. Late in his BA he discovered the academic study of religion, and spent several years preparing for and completing an MA in Religious Studies. He moved to Toronto to take up his PhD in New Testament Studies. He came to Carleton in 2003″ (Carleton Website).
The debate takes place at Centrepointe Chamber Theatre, Saturday, April 5, 2014, 7:30-10:00 pm.
Tickets on sale now. Go here.
$15 general admission
$10 for CFI members
Special offer for new members: Become a Friend of the Centre for Inquiry, and get one free ticket (two for a family membership). You can join online(http://centreforinquiry.ca/support/centre_for_inquiry_membership/), or at any CFI Ottawa event.
Yours truly won’t be able to be there since I’m here and here and will be for the foreseeable future. Alas. But hopefully the debate will be online eventually. It should be good. Carrier is quite a celebrity in the mythical-Jesus camp and is formally trained as an ancient historian. Crook is likewise a serious historian with a speciality in New Testament and he has no theological axe to grind, so the debate should be on matters of data, method, and interpretation.
Posted on February 20, 2014 at 11:07 am by Dr. Jim
It was brew day yesterday; my third batch of homebrew beer and it went pretty well. My first two batches were from dry malt extract but this was an all grain kit so it was a bit more involved. I’ve also done a number of kegs of cheap cider and that is dead easy.
I got the latest kit from Ontario Beer Kegs, who I highly recommend for all things homebrew related. I’ve bought kegs, various parts and all my beer kits from them. Really fast service and the prices are really good.
Their American Stout kit came with the following:
9 lb 2 row malted barley
1 lb chocolate malt barley
1 lb roasted barley
1 oz Cascade hops (60 min)
1 oz Northern Brewer hops
Safale US 05 yeast.
I finally got to try out my el-cheapo Canadian Tire turkey frier. I used the pot before but not the burner. It went pretty well: no injuries, property loss, threatened law suits, or visits from the police. One bad boil-over, though.
Looks pretty gross. Kind of like what I hope it doesn’t look like once I drink a lot of it.
I did not get an accurate measure of how much beer I ended up with but it seemed a lot more than the 5 gallons I was shooting for. Not that I’m complaining.
For an all grain kit you get the ingredients and only instructions for how long and what temperature you mash the pre-beery-goodness grains in hot water and at what temperature, and how long you boil the result and when to add the hops to the boil. The rest is up to you because there are so many different ways to go about it. I did the simplest way, Brew in a Bag. What this means is that all your grains go in a great big bag that is lining the mash bucket. When done, the bag is removed with all the grain, it is squished out and there you have your wort. Less efficient than other ways but it is cheaper in terms of equipment needed and easier.
I had to use an online beer calculator to figure out how much water to start with. It suggested 7.4 gal which was suspiciously close to the brim of my 9 gallon brew pot. Technically, you are supposed to brew in bag in a single pot for heating the water, mashing and then boiling. I’m glad I bought an Igloo cooler for mashing in the bag since there wasn’t really room for the 11 lbs of grains in pot with all the water. A pain transferring the hot water (twice!), though.
I really squished the bag out pretty thoroughly, and so maybe I recovered more of the absorbed water than the program thought I should and that’s why I have more beer. My hydrometer showed an OG of 1.056 @ 72 F (recipe estimated 1.054), so it’s not really watered down. I also got to use my new wort chiller which just hooks up to a garden hose and the coils transfer the heat. Some experimenting with the proper water pressure was needed, and of course I got soaked.
Anyway, it was loads of fun despite Mary not volunteering to do all the clean up for me. In 3-4 weeks I should have some 5.5% ABV stout entertain myself with. And I now also have a proper stout faucet, so I should be able to get a nice creamy head on the brew if I get the pressures right.
Stouts are generally low carbed and pushed with Beer gas (a mix of nitrogen and CO2) through special faucets. I’ve been using beer gas at Molly’s from the start that I used for everything but now I also have a small CO2 tank for other beers that need more fizz, like the wheat beer I have on tap now.
And what to do with 11 lbs of post-beery-goodness barley? We found a recipe for using them as a basis for Peanut Butter Dog Biscuits. Goliath and I intend on doing some male bonding over a brew!
Goliath, the manyly mountaineer, will obviously need a brewski biscuit when he comes down from there.
Posted on February 5, 2014 at 11:27 am by Dr. Jim
Planning is now underway for our 12th Annual Research in Religious Studies Conference to be held on May 8 and 9, 2014 at the University of Calgary. Our conference has been held in Lethbridge since its inception in 2003 but since the Pacific Northwest Region of the American Academy of Religion and the Society of Biblical Literature meeting will take place in Calgary we are pleased to relocate for this one year. This will make travel to the conference much easier for students from other locales in and outside of Alberta. Yours truly remains the primary contact person; therefore, please contact me (james.linville AT uleth.ca) with any questions, etc.
Over each of the last several years we have had over forty papers presented. Students came from across Canada and some even from the US. It is a great experience. This year, students will be able to stay for the AAR/SBL regional meeting (separate registration needed).
In general, we try to evaluate each paper proposal as they come in. We don’t a fixed number of papers we can accept. If it is good, we will find a spot for it! We have accepted three papers already from three different institutions. Remarkably, two of them are on the Hebrew Bible. We usually get relatively few on that, but lots on Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, Religion in Popular Culture, Gender, Methodology, and many that don’t fit any category (which is why we don’t make up the sessions and sections until we have the papers accepted). Anyway, it’s a great time and a splendid learning opportunity.
The conference provides undergraduate and graduate level students with the opportunity to present papers on the history, belief, practices, cultural contexts, and artistic or literary expressions of any religious tradition. Proposals for papers from any discipline within the academic fields of the humanities and social science are welcome.
The conference is open to students from any educational institute at any point in their educational career. Although we encourage PhD students to attend, we are particularly seeking papers by undergraduate and masters level students.
Papers will be selected on basis of abstracts submitted.
The here to submit your abstract!
For help with abstracts and getting your paper ready for presentation, go here.
Posted on November 27, 2013 at 8:28 pm by Dr. Jim
Posted on November 1, 2013 at 9:27 am by Dr. Jim
Posted on October 3, 2013 at 1:31 pm by Dr. Jim
A new letter in the Lethbridge Herald has thrown open the question over the scope of the Evil Fluoride Conspiracy:
It is comforting to know that the truth about toxic fluoride is being publicized by yard signs, flyers, letters to The Herald (A. Crook, Sept. 19; T. Hall, Sept. 22), and numerous online comments on The Herald’s website. Now, I’m as sensible as the next guy, and a patriotic disbeliever in everything we’re told by medical and scientific “experts” (who claim this title only because of their education and not that they truly know anything), but could someone tell me how the heck Big Fluoride has been covering up the horrific effects of forced fluoridation on whole populations?
Most people in Alberta have been drinking fluoridated water for decades, including yours truly. Why does the media report on mere dozens or hundreds killed in far away wars and not the tens of thousands who must be dying from fluoride right here at home? It should seem obvious that the claimed health-care backlog is actually due to fluoride poisoning and that doctors are being paid by Big Fluoride cover it up with false diagnoses of the flu, bicycle accidents, not eating enough (non-organic, industrially-unblemished) rutabagas and such like. I don’t mean to frighten anyone, but shouldn’t you be more suspicious? Have you been lied to?
What is the dental-industrial complex doing with all the acutely ill sufferers? Do they get whisked away to some (.9 parts per million) concentration camp to hide them from second opinions sought by desperate loved ones who will stop at nothing to get a truthful answer? Or has the conspiracy been so successful that there isn’t a single honest doctor left anymore? Why don’t we notice people dropping dead on the street after sipping a coffee made with local water? It must be some kind of mind control drug they slip in with the fluoride, chlorine and God knows what else. How deep this conspiracy must go!
These are the kinds of issues I’m going to ask that the candidates in the upcoming election address and you should ask, too.
Posted on September 25, 2013 at 2:02 pm by Dr. Jim
Thanks to Joan Cook and the good folks at Catholic Biblical Quarterly, I just got a review copy of Ellie Assis The Book of Joel: A Prophet Between Calamity and Hope (LHB/OTS 581; Bloomsbury, 2013).
Prophetic sayings are generally a reaction to immediate realities, and therefore attempts to understand prophetic literature without the benefit of the prophet’s historical milieu are limited or inaccurate. Contrary to the prevailing opinion that Joel is post-exilic, the book is located within the exilic period, recognising the lack of any rebuke consistent with a people experiencing deep despair. The Book of Joel places great emphasis on the motif of the divine presence residing in the midst of Israel, and it is asserted that the prophet’s main purpose was to bring the people to renew their connection with the Lord after the destruction of the Temple, which, though physically ruined, had not lost its religious significance. A literary and rhetorical analysis demonstrates how the prophet sought to influence his audience. Literary devices and rhetorical tools are investigated, and their relevance and contribution to the book’s meanings are explored. One central feature of the book is its focus on a detailed discussion of the position and purpose of the locust plague, employing recent literary approaches.
I’m finally getting around to do some serious OT writing, and I’m planning a book on Joel and Habakkuk and so this is going to be a great read. I’ve liked a lot of Assis’ work and my initial thumb through his new book suggests I will learn a lot.