But when I do, he cries.
Here’s one I found
I made this one:
- http://diylol.com
I made this one, too.

Posted on February 25, 2012 at 1:29 pm by Dr. Jim
Posted on February 23, 2012 at 1:47 pm by Dr. Jim
I’ve been working on an SBL paper proposal and just submitted it. It’s probably full of typos. As usual. And silliness. As usual.
Its for the “Scripture and Film” section. Never submitted a paper on movies before, so I’m kind of excited. I really hope they take it. Here is the abstract:
The 1972 film, Silent Running (dir. Douglas Trumbull) and the 2008 hit animated feature, Wall-E (dir. Andrew Stanton), revolve around themes of a future Earth unable to support vegetation. Both films freely adapt Genesis’s stories of paradise and Noah’s ark, albeit to different ends. Neither film is a warning about the death of humanity because of environmental damage, but a call to “enlightenment”, i.e., to knowledge of a true relationship between nature and humanity. Yet, both films undermine this truth even as it is asserted as they seemingly put an ignorant humanity in the place of a deity as creators of robots that carry “true” human ideals.
Silent Running is set aboard one of a number of giant spacecraft housing the last remnants of Earth’s forests. The story revolves around a crew member, Freeman Lowell and the ship’s three robots (named Huey, Dewey, and Louie). Enraged by an order to destroy the forest-domes so that the ship can return to commercial use, Lowell murders his crew-mates. Before committing suicide, he leaves one forest-dome in the care of Dewey. Silent Running’s idealistic but disturbing hero is both Adam and Cain but also God, in appointing Dewey to biblical Adam’s task of preserving the garden.
The 2008 hit animated feature, Wall-E stars an earth-bound machine and his robotic romantic interest, Eve. Wall-E is a kind of inverted Adam figure, cleaning up the planet after it was abandoned by humans until vegetation can grow again. Again, humanity is in no danger of extinction although they are unknowingly in the control of a computer system that does not want an Exodus back to earth. With children in its intended audience, Wall-E is a far more optimistic film.
The two films “humanize” the robots with emotions and they become idealized humans charged with a “sacred” mission on behalf of “natural” humanity. The films appear to be asking whether people can live up to the human potential of their own creations. As creators, however, humans assume the role of gods, but the two films differ on the potential of humanity to be restrained by the products of its own ingenuity.
Posted on February 21, 2012 at 1:00 pm by Dr. Jim
Biblioblogger Chris Tilling usually ends up in some pretty funny places, at least according to another (alleged) blogger who often reports on reports of Tilling’s reported appearances. I’ve no idea where the heck he is now, but here is how he “navigates”. He has guidance from the heavens: A Godly Path Satellite!

We all know where he is trying to get to, though. He is trying to come to God:

Posted on February 19, 2012 at 9:12 am by Dr. Jim
Saw this at Dhormockery.com I’m not sure, but I think the site is in Hindi. Can’t read any of the text, but this is surely part of the Global Evil Atheist Conspiracy (Blasphemous Iconography Command), and whoever is behind it does a great job finding good images. Translates a lot of cartoons into her/his own language too.
Also found this there. Take that, you irresponsible pet owning deities! It’s from the Poo-attitudes

Posted on February 7, 2012 at 11:29 am by Dr. Jim
It’s time for Dr. Jim to start thinking about what sort of papers to propose for November’s Society of Biblical Literature meeting in Chicago as the deadline is fast approaching. I’ve never been to Chicago, so this is going to be a treat. But what sort of paper to do? I wish I had a mind to make up.
Since I’m working on Hebrew Bible mythology, I suppose I should do a paper on that, but the Bible, Myth and Myth Theory session is really encouraging New Testament papers this time around, but they might have room for one on ancient Israel and the Old Testament as a mythic places and spaces for thought in modern religion, (relying on Burton Mack, J. Z. Smith, Wendy Doniger).
I’m on the steering committee of the Israelite Prophetic Literature Program Unit, but I don’t feel right proposing papers for sessions I’m helping to plan and for which I have to evaluate other folks’ abstracts. I’m also on the steering committee for the proposed Secular Biblical Criticism program unit which will probably go through a name change before gaining final approval. If we get a session this year (as we did last year) I do have a few papers in mind, but since we have had to have 4 or 5 sessions pencilled in (we had to come up with a multi-year plan for the application to prove we could sustain interest), it would depend what the other folks on the committee thought best to lead off with. I think it’s doubtful they will give us two sessions this year, so perhaps I won’t get a paper in this at all.
Anyway, here are the two I have been thinking about for the Secular sessions. No real abstract yet, just a title. I always start with a title now, then think up what the paper is supposed to be about a few months later. It never use dto be that way. I would usually start with some sort of project idea and just call it “Fred” until it took shape. Alas.
“The Royal Scam: Josiah, Joseph Smith and Believing (and Selling) One’s own Pious Frauds.” This is a paper I’ve wanted to write for a long time. It’s inspired by a paper on Josiah by A.J. Droge,”The Lying Pen of Scribes: of Holy Books and Pious Frauds” (Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 2003) that offers a nice history of the use of the term “pious fraud” in biblical studies and looks at the production of “ancient” holy books in the ancient Mediterranean world. Droge also writes (in the abstract) “the absence of ‘fraud’ from the disciplinary lexica [of Religious Studies] is more than a little curious, especially since ‘fraud’ is very much a part of religion’s vocabulary, and, from a cynical view of religion’s history, ‘fraud’ might very be regarded as the modus operandi religiousus‘. I think Droge’s argument can be widened and I’d like to follow up on some of the questions surrounding the marketing of brand new “old” books or the claims of “divine inspiration” in producing others.
And the title is inspired by this:
Steely Dan: The Royal Scam
“On the Religion of Bronze Age Goat-Herders. Ancient Israel as a secularist’s foil” This one takes a poke at the way the religions of ancient Israel and the biblical texts are (mis)represented in the popular literature of activist, secularists and atheists. I came across a number of places where the Old Testament was called something like “The mythology of a bunch of Bronze Age goat-herders”, which is wrong on a few counts. Elsewhere, one finds that the Biblical conceptions were simply “stolen from the Babylonians”. What i want to do in this paper is argue that one job of secular biblical scholarship should be to address these kinds of misrepresentations and that doing so may be almost as important (if not equally so) as addressing fundamentalist or conservative misrepresentation of biblical origins.
See, this is NOT a Bronze Age goat. It is a Bronze Age sheep. (Doesn’t the
Bronze Age sheepdog look a bit like a Bronze Age Spuds McKenzie?)
If the secular thing doesn’t work out, I will need a backup plan. If I don’t do a paper, I don’t get funding. If I don’t get funding, I will have to start shameless money-grubbing online. And if that doesn’t work, I will have to pay out of pocket to go, because I have meetings there I can’t miss.
Fortunately, there are some other good sessions that would be a lot of fun to talk part in. Damn thing is, the paper would probably have to make sense. I hate reality.
There is an interesting session hosted by the “Use, Influence, and Impact of the Bible” program unit. according to the call for papers, “This program unit explores how the Bible has been used and/or influential in the way it has been received in society. The focus is upon the reception of the text in contexts other than a narrow critical-academic one.”
I think it would be interesting to do a study on representation of the Bible and Bible topics in newspapers over the past few decades: see when where and how the Bible shows up in mainstream newspapers (outside of the overt “Religion/Faith” sections. This would touch on politics, educational policy, etc etc. Could be fun.
Robert Cargill is heading up the Blogger and Online Publication section. “The open session calls for papers focusing on any area of blogging and online publication in relation to biblical studies, theology, and archaeology of the Levant. Special consideration will be given to those papers addressing the use of online technologies for peer-review and evaluation of academic research.” There seems to be only one session, so the competition might be tough. I REALLY hate reality. I think I’d like to do a paper on the need for peer reviewing biblical lolcats. Except for mine. They’re great. Here’s the latest.
Vote for my Baptized Kitty and help her
get on the Front Page of Icanhascheezeburger!
Just click the pic!
And then there is the Bible and Popular Culture section that is having two sessions. One is on the U.S. elections and/or Tebowing. I think one is just dumb, and as for the other, I don’t like football. But the open session might be loads of fun. Must think. Must think… Hmmm…. would they go for a paper on Slinky Bible Babes in film and stuff?

Anyway, I will get something sorted out. Please send in ideas so I can rip them off.
Posted on February 5, 2012 at 9:16 am by Dr. Jim
Posted on February 4, 2012 at 11:39 am by Dr. Jim
Saw this on Face book posted by Russell McCutcheon.
Absolutely BRILLIANT
And check out my old post on Debaptism. It blows.
http://drjimsthinkingshop.com/2009/07/debaptism-cmon-out-the-blowdryer-is-fine/
A snippet Yes, I’ve been touched by the
Ephemeral Appendage of the Blow Dryer of Reason.™®.

The new Blowhard 3000 Debaptizer. Blows your mind, rationally.
SOme more baptism funnies

And I just found this on Fractally Wrong:

Has your baptism caused problems in your life? Were you baptized against your will as an innocent child, only to find out years later that it necessarily gives you life-membership in an insane, brainwashing cult of zombie worshipers? Perhaps you’re just embarrassed about ΙΧΘΥΣ odor and itch. …
Posted on February 3, 2012 at 3:43 pm by Dr. Jim